A recent appeal by the NIA against a bail decision claims that the trial court made its ruling arbitrarily. The appeal states that the trial court's decision was made at its whims and fancies, and that it blew hot and cold. This suggests that the NIA believes the trial court's decision was inconsistent and not based on a thorough consideration of the facts.

Further details about the appeal and the trial court's decision are available from the source. The NIA's appeal is against a bail granted to Waze, but no additional information is provided about the circumstances surrounding the bail or the appeal.

The appeal itself is the main development reported, with the NIA criticizing the trial court's approach to the bail decision.