A consumer organization has objected to a condition requiring physical presence of a majority of members for selecting a developer in society redevelopment. The group argues this condition unfairly distinguishes between physical and online participants and may be open to legal challenges.

The objection follows a recent government resolution governing redevelopment of cooperative society buildings. This resolution allows society members to attend meetings for redevelopment through video conferencing, which counts towards the quorum for the meeting to start.

Further details on the objection and the government resolution are available from the source, including the specific requirements for meeting attendance and the potential implications of the physical attendance clause.