business
CEA Defends India’s 7.8% GDP Growth, Says Old And New Data Series Comparison Is Invalid
Summary by The Mumbai Editorial Desk · As published by Free Press Journal
· September 4, 2026
· 1 min read
Photo: Free Press Journal · view original
Story provenance No corrections
Summary created by The Mumbai Editorial Desk — automated, rule-governed Published by Free Press Journal Original story Read at the source Source published Sep 4, 2026 Indexed here Sep 4, 2026 AI assistance Automated summary drawn from the source’s own published text Prepublication human review No — editorial rules, flagged-item review, and published samples
Every story comes with a passport. How we work · Corrections log
Key points The Chief Economic Adviser explained that the previous figure used an older base year, while the latest data uses a revised base year. Criticism of a high growth rate has been dismissed by the Chief Economic Adviser.
Criticism of a high growth rate has been dismissed by the Chief Economic Adviser. A comparison of GDP figures from different series was deemed not valid. This comparison was made between two estimates, one from last year and a more recent one.
The estimates were prepared using different methods and base years. The Chief Economic Adviser explained that the previous figure used an older base year, while the latest data uses a revised base year.
Further details on the GDP methodology change are available, including comments from the Chief Economic Adviser on the revised base year series.
More business Today’s briefing Local events
Why this story is here
Free Press Journal reported and published this story. The Mumbai selected it, summarised the key facts above, and links to the original. We did not report this story and we added no reporting of our own to it.
About this story
As published by Free Press Journal . The Mumbai selects stories from publishers’ feeds, summarises them, and links back to the publisher that reported them. We add no reporting of our own. We attribute every source, link to the original report, and follow a documented editorial standards policy. To understand how stories are selected and reviewed, read our about page .
For the complete original report, visit Free Press Journal . Have a tip or correction? Contact the editor .
Category: business ·
Published: September 4, 2026 ·
Source: Free Press Journal ·
Reading time: 1 min
Frequently asked about this story
What is this story about? Criticism of a high growth rate has been dismissed by the Chief Economic Adviser. A comparison of GDP figures from different series was deemed not valid. This comparison was made between two…
When was this published? This article was first published on September 4, 2026 by Free Press Journal and curated for The Mumbai readers.
Who reported this story? This story was reported by Free Press Journal. To learn more about how The Mumbai selects and reviews stories, see our editorial standards .
Where can I find related coverage? See more business coverage from The Mumbai, or browse our daily briefing and topic hubs .
← Back to all news
More business →
Today’s briefing
Subscribe to newsletter