A housing society's actions were criticized for being inconsistent. The society had sought benefits for some occupants while denying them to another. This discrepancy was noted in a recent judgment.

A developer's membership was upheld, but with certain restrictions. The membership was limited to a specific area of basement space that was originally sanctioned for storage.

Further details about the case and the judgment are available, including the society's arguments and the court's decision to grant membership to the developer despite the society's challenge.